Criticism Should = Kindness

The degree of one’s criticism should be commensurate with one’s degree of kindness. The harsher the criticism, the greater the kindness that you should have when criticizing. This is to avoid embarassment. And people are easily willing to shut down conversations or maintain false views in order not to be embarrassed. For example, when I pointed out that the so-called “bacon-eating atheist Jew” is mentally challenged – a fact that has been verified by his denial of my explanation of why he is not a Jew, and his complete misquotation of the subtitle of my blog as “spreading the truth about God” – I should’ve referred to him as “dimwit” instead of “f-k face.” That would’ve been more appropriate. Or perhaps the Southern “bless his heart” would’ve summed it up quite nicely.

What Retards Are Running the McCain Campaign?

I don’t have time for this. I really don’t. But I have to say this, right now.

The McCain campaign is being run by retards.

The House is about to pass a bill that basically amounts to a New Deal Part 2, a socialist mandate that will cost this country a lot more than $700 million. It has relegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the power “…to ensure the economic well-being of Americans”, and it involves giving the government a lot more power over the housing market, and the assets in question. The bill will be a complete stinker, as anticipated. And McCain isn’t talking about it.

Furthermore, McCain could’ve done a much better job in the debate if he were to have explained the root cause of this economic turmoil, and if he spoke in terms of principles, rather than let the B.O. spew his socialist assumptions. He had the chance to double his points, and he didn’t because his campaign is being run by retards! Why aren’t these retards consulting people who know their stuff, like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Even I  can do a better job advising the McCain campaign.

Democrats are getting away with murder, and McCain isn’t driving home the point. Fiddle sticks.

People, this has to be a grass-roots campaign. McCain’s men are incompetent. Put up those signs. Wear those shirts. Put on those pins. Talk to people. Spread the word. We are our only hope.

As I Said, the Soldier Took ‘Em Down

Post-Debate Postmortem

Posted by: Pejman Yousefzadeh

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 03:16AM

Obama partisans are crowing about CNN’s poll of viewers calling the debate an Obama win. Unfortunately, there is a problem with CNN’s sampling:

The results may be favoring Obama simply because more Democrats than Republicans tuned in to the debate. Of the debate-watchers questioned in this poll, 41 percent of the respondents identified themselves as Democrats, 27 percent as Republicans and 30 percent as independents.

The best estimate of the number of Democrats in the voting age population as a whole indicates that the sample is roughly 5 to 7 percentage points more Democratic than the population as a whole.

Notice that these paragraphs get buried at the bottom of the story…

The Soldier Takes ‘Em Down

No doubt about it. I’m sure the Leftist media would “disagree.”

We already knew that McCain is on the Right side of economic and social policy. The only real question was whether he would lose focus on our need to finish the job in Iraq. Neither candidate knows the real culprits of 9/11. But anybody who thinks that B.O. would be better for our troops needs to watch this debate. It has reaffirmed something I already knew: McCain is the man for the job.

I would also like to mention that Ronald Reagan would be turning in his grave if the Socialist Stench were elected President. How dare he quote Reagan’s “America is a shining beacon on a hill” to try to score eloquence points.

You can watch the debate below.

Constipation on the Hill

House Democrats are blaming Republicans in general – and Sen. John McCain in particular – for stalling the bail-out bill for no good reason. However, the Democrats have a majority in the House, so they can push through this bill without even consulting Republicans. And they haven’t really been consulting Republicans, because they are Democrats – the same Democrats who caused the problem to begin with – and they are both philosophically and personally vested in controlling the contents of this bill. So why have they been blaming Republicans in general, and McCain in particular, for the bill’s having been stalled?

Because the Democrats are using the Republicans as a scapegoat, because they are having great difficulty coming up with a bill that they can agree upon. All hell broke loose in the meeting room. And the presence of Barak Obama, who followed in McCain’s path to Washington, did not help matters. In fact, it showed us that Obama was incapable of controlling the situation.

McCain stopped by to see what was going on, and to help in any way that he could. Because he’s a Senator and that’s his job. But Democrats aren’t open to Republican help, let alone McCain’s help. They certainly don’t want McCain to get credit for bringing order to the court. The only reason that the Democrats would in any way consult with Republicans on the matter is so that they can use Republicans as a scapegoat for not being able to decide upon a bill (which the Democrats have been doing), or for any problems that may be in the bill, or that may result from the bill.

Unfortunately, the masses are swallowing up visions put out by the Leftist media that McCain is somehow hampering progress on the Hill. But that couldn’t be further from the truth. The Democrats are hampering their own progress, have not been helped by B.O., and are blaming it on the Republicans, just as they blamed Republicans for the crisis to begin with. But let it not be forgotten: it is the Democrats who made this mess, and now it is the Democrats who are responsible for cleaning it up.

God help whatever bill comes out of that stink-house on the Hill.

But … a Woman Can be Just as Wise as a Wise Man

As long as she learns from a truly wise man.

Women Are Not Beacons of Wisdom

They really aren’t. And I am sick and tired of the media portraying them to be precisely this. Any man who looks to a woman as a source of wisdom is seriously confused. And any woman who goes with a man who is below her is seriously confused. However, that does not mean that women cannot be good friends with men. There are things that women can bring to the table. But a superior grasp of the meaning and purpose of life is not one of them.

Sorry ladies!

If you want to know the meaning and purpose of life, which you should, I am about to release a redo of the Philosophy of Life. I have already released half of it with my “Time for Philosophy” series. And I am about to release the rest. So stay tuned.

Minutemen Take Caltrans to Court

Should there be open borders or closed borders? It’s a false alternative. There should be conditionally open borders. People should be able to reside and work in this country as long as they become citizens of it. Once citizenship is acquired, it is okay to open the border to them. Illegal immigrants are not on the public record, and they do not pay taxes for this reason. They have no right to be here. And I commend what the dopey Bush called “vigilantes”: the Minutemen who watch over our borders above and beyond the Border Patrol. If this is what our dopey President thinks about the Minutemen, and if their freedoms are being curtailed, I would hate to smell what the Socialist Stench would do about them, and about immigration in general.

More here on the lawsuit.

Stupid Congressman Opens His Mouth On Behalf of “Jews and [Africs]“

I’ll let you guess what race to which this guy belongs. Let’s see, we have several options: Afric, Asic, Mexic … Europic. Take a guess.

“If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention,” said Hastings. “Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through.”

To read more about this clown’s comments, click here.

How Should a Flat Tax Address “Unearned Income”?

So-called “unearned income” constitutes returns on one’s investments. How should a flat tax address it?

If someone’s wealth increases, it should be taxed, according to the  Flat Tax Manifesto. When applied to returns on one’s investments (dividends), those taxes would be called “capital gains taxes,” and dividends are considered income as soon as they become liquid.

Do I Think McCain is Perfect?

In the words of Queen, “No, no, no, no, no, no, no!” But – for God’s sake – consider that a) he’s a politician, and politicians have to at least pretend to have imperfect views to appeal to the masses, and b) look at whom he’s running against.

Though Bush was the perfect neo-con, because of his lack of intelligence, McCain is not. McCain has a brain. He’s his own man. And I don’t see him being duped into unnecessary wars above and beyond the war we are already in. Do you expect him to say, “the Zionists are to blame!,” and completely lose his political career? He supported the Surge, and the Surge has helped protect troops. He isn’t interested in global domination; he is interested in protecting our troops, and protecting America. Though he isn’t morally perfect because he doesn’t know the Philosophy of Life, neither are you, because neither do you. But take any issue, and he stands on the Right side of it.

People need to understand how politics works. They need to understand that comprise may be necessary as a politician, and as a voter. As a Ron Paul supporter who fears for this nation, I have to vote for McCain.

Something That Women Need to Know About Men

Just because you are an attractive woman, that doesn’t mean that a man wants to sleep with you, or sleep with you at that time. Women do not understand that real men have no interest in sleeping with bitches who do not appreciate or love the men. If the woman is a bitch, then the component of love is stripped from the act, and it is replaced with repulsion. That is why women take their men’s sexual appetites personally: they know that deep down inside. They know that men do not want to have sex with women they don’t like on an individual basis. And when men do not perform as expected, it may be because they want to sleep with a real woman, not with a confused woman whose views are repugnant.

Men can have very powerful sex drives. But real men are attracted not only to the body; they are attracted to the mind. When the mind of a woman is beautiful, it is as though an extension of the woman’s body is beautiful. And when the mind is ugly, it is as though the body is ugly. Men of wisdom are attracted to women of wisdom, and repulsed by women who harbor evil beliefs and views.

How do you know whether your mind is appealing to the man of wisdom? Must you agree with him on everything? Absolutely not. Rather, for you simply to love the man is enough of an indicator that – regardless of where you stand in terms of your personal growth and maturity – you are wise enough to appreciate the wise man. Thus, your simple love and respect and appreciation for the man is enough to draw the man to you.

Today there is a popular notion that men are attracted to bitches. This is only the case for men who have low self-esteem, and who are masochistic for this reason. Only a masochistic man with low self-esteem would be attracted to bitches. But real men, who love themselves, are disgusted by domineering man-like bitches.

The man of wisdom is not hot for women who are not hot for him. If a woman does not love me, then I do not love her. I don’t do unreciprocated love, and neither does any other wise man. That is why I am not emotionally attached to women. The more that they like me, the more that I like them. And if they don’t like me, then it’s okay, because then I don’t like them.

The only time that a man of wisdom would be disturbed when confronted with a bitch is when he knows that the woman in question may very well not be a bitch, and the man has a desire to help the woman climb out of the hole that she has dug for herself. Then the man’s woe lies in the fact that the woman in question could’ve been a real woman with good values, and lovable for that reason, but the demon inside overtook her. Parents would feel the same when dealing with children who go astray, and get into all sorts of trouble. The parent still cares about the child, because the child still has the potential to be helped.

My love is not cheap. But when I see a woman with potential, it breaks my heart to know that she may be going down the wrong path. The bitch inside of her does not want to be helped. The bitch inside of her is a demon, and I don’t like seeing the demon take over the woman, and poison her mind along with her body. That, too, is disturbing.

It is a testament to my intense passion for the female body that I have been able to go as far as I have in the past. But, generally speaking, I cannot have sex with a woman that does not like me: even if she does have potential.

Notice the Leftist Bias (How Can You Not?)

The Left says that Obama rejects McCain’s call to delay debate (AP).

Wait a minute. McCain doesn’t call for the debate to be delayed. He calls to do what a responsible Senator should do at a time like this, and go to Washington to address this bill that is about to be written, which could cost tax payers $700 billion if passed. Notice that they don’t say “Obama rejects McCain’s call to address crisis.”

B.O.’s response? Ridiculous. “[But I wanna spew my hot air! And I wanna do it now! Waaaaa!]” He is showing us that he puts politics ahead of progress. No surprise there.

RedState has more.

Putting Shooting Sprees In Perspective

What should you do when some fool goes on a shooting spree, killing innocent people, such as what took place in Norway just a couple days ago? Should you restrict access to guns?

No. To the contrary, these shooting-sprees should increase the demand for guns. There is no question that we should have the freedom to bear arms. How else do we overthrow a dictatorship if it arises? But if someone pulls out a gun and goes on a shooting spree, he should definitely be killed as soon as possible.

That is the answer.

The Real Racists and Sexists are Leftists

What is racism? It is dishonesty about race. And who is dishonest about race? The one who says that there is such a thing as race, and that the Europic race is supreme? Or is it Leftists who say that race doesn’t exist, and that all the races are equal? The Leftists are the real racists, and their racism is directed against Europic men and women.

What is sexism? It is dishonesty about sex. And who is dishonest about sex? The one who says that there is such a thing as sex, and that there are sex roles in which men should specialize in one area and women should specialize in another? Or is it the Leftists who say that sex doesn’t exist, that both sexes are equal, and there is nothing wrong with homosexuality? The Leftists are the real sexists, and their sexism is directed against men and women alike.

As for slavery, that’s just a stupid economic policy. It holds people down who are able to rise above. If people are above slavery, then they should be able to rise above it. But if people are only worthy of slavery, then they would get paid a slave’s wage. Slavery is bad for the economy, and that is why it is wrong.

This is honesty, and there is nothing wrong with it. But there is something wrong with racism and sexism: products of the Left.

The Race Connection

What does race have to do with the recent mortgage/finance problem?

“The Washington Post reported that the company conducted a study in which it was found that far more black people have bad credit than white people, even when both have the same incomes. In fact, the study showed a higher percentage of African Americans with incomes of $65,000 to $75,000 had bad credit than white Americans with incomes of below $25,000.”

Read the rest.

‘All I Could See Was Somebody’s Son or Daughter’

A former abortionist speaks out.

Get Your Gear

Right here.

Guess Who is Responsible for this Housing-Banking Crisis

If you are an economically ignorant Leftist Democrat, you would say “the free market” or “the Bush administration.”

This is what you will not hear from the media. The housing/banking crisis was caused by the Leftist Democrats, starting with Jimmy Carter’s Community Development Act, continuing with Bill Clinton and Janet Reno, and facilitated by Rep. Barney Frank (D), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Rep. Chris Dodd (D). These Democrats – who are now blaming capitalism – are squarely responsible for the current trouble in the housing/banking sectors, because, starting with Jimmy Carter and his disastrous administration, they have put in place regulations and legal threats geared towards forcing the banks to lend money to people who are not likely to pay it back – i.e. sub-prime mortgages – and, when they don’t pay it back, the Democrats would make the banks allow people to stay in the homes. Billions of dollars have gone towards these disastrous loans. As Rush Limbaugh says, “all roads lead to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,” for these entities largely took over the task of handing out bad loans.

When the government forces banks to make loans that people are not likely to pay back, failure is inevitable. These loans can basically be thought of as major government give-a-ways. But it wasn’t the government giving these pseudo-loans away; it was the banking sector, with the government’s gun at her head. And these Democrat scum bags want to blame it on economically negligible CEO bonuses, which have nothing to do with the price of tea in China. As for the Bush Administration, on a dozen occasions, it tried to address this issue. Sen. McCain spoke of an impending financial crisis (see below).

But here’s the worst part: the McCain campaign is not being straight about the culprits of this crisis. Instead, they are taking the populist tone of “Wall Street greed” as the culprit, as if that makes any sense. They are also blaming SEC chief Christopher Cox: a nice conservative Republican from Orange County. It is important to tell the truth; not to appeal to the prejudices of the masses. And the McCain campaign is making its first big mistake by playing the populist “greed” card at this juncture.

Not only are Democrats squarely responsible for this because of their faulty philosophy/politics; they have profited from it personally, in the way of payoffs. Rep. Chris Dodd was paid off the most by Freddie and Fannie, followed by guess-who? Mr. Affirmative Action himself. And now, to paraphrase Rush Limbaugh, the very people who broke the home mortgage system seek to control it.

McCain for President.

Change We Can Believe In?

B.O. Attacks McCain by Advertising on His Behalf

I don’t watch TV, but I hear through the grapevine that the Socialist Stench is accusing McCain of having a party platform in which he is so pro-life that, by golly, he even opposes feticide in cases of rape and incest.

Now, I think there’s something seriously wrong with opposing B.O. just because of his pro-abortion views. I mean, what about everything else that he stands for, including socialism, immigration, anti-family values, internationalism: basically turning this country into an even smellier sewer than it has already become since the Federal Reserve was established. But that does not subtract from the evil of his pro-death position. To quote Mr. Affirmative Action: “But but but but but … if my daughters make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

Yes, American voters. Be very wary of McCain. Why, his pro-life platform will surely match that of his runningmate’s if he is elected President.

McCain Has a Brain

This is just one example of the fact (click the link to read the rest):

John McCain Warned Of Mortgage Collapse In 2005

Posted by: Ken_Taylor

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 10:06AM

Barack Obama has been playing off the fears that are running rampant in the market because of the collapse of several of Wall Streets major investment companies like Lehman Brothers. Attacking John McCain and trying to create the idea that McCain does not know what he is talking about and that he is ignorant when it comes to the economy.

For Mr. Obama’s information John McCain saw this collapse coming as far back as 2005 and not only warned of the coming collapse but co-sponsored legislation to try and prevent it and go after the corruption that was causing much of the problem. Following is McCain’s speech on the Senate floor during debate of Federal Housing Regulatory Act Of 2005 urging the Senate to pass the Act which fell to defeat after being blocked by Senate Democrats.

Mr. President, (referring to the Presiding Officer of the Senate) this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.

Will God Punish Us or Reward Us?

You may wonder why God has brought about such a close competition between B.O. and Senator John McCain. I mean: if God really has the power, then why would He do this? Why not just easily elect McCain (or Ron Paul) President? Why the close race?

The answer is that God must strike a delicate balance between punishing the evil fools of the world, and rewarding the wise men. If Mr. Affirmative Action were elected President, God forbid, then that would punish the entire nation. If Senator John McCain were elected President, God willing, then that would reward the entire nation. God wants to punish the guilty, but He also wants to reward the innocent. That is why we face this dilemma.

However, I believe that it would be an excessive punishment of the nation to elect B.O. President of these United States. So I pray to God that the punishment Leftards deserve comes in the form of losing this election – not bringing down the entire nation with their foolishness.

Life is Life

Not only is it the case that God is God. It is also the case that life is life. Some of us hate life. Some of us love life. Either way, life is life.

Time for Philosophy Pt. VII

God takes the particles that He created, and He moves them in such a way that is best for His purpose: which is to create brains that contain models of God. However, God is always thrown off balance because of new particles that enter His universe. Thus, though He may plan for His particles to move in a certain direction one moment, He may change His plan another moment with the entrance of new particles into His universe.

In the universe, we find the contrast between order and chaos. The order in the universe is the part of the universe that is particularly God-like in its formation. The chaos in the universe is the part of the universe that is not particularly God-like in its formation. The less God-like are the particles in any part of the universe, the more “devilish” the particles. But let it be known that there is only one God, and He is not in competition with any other gods. Rather, He is in competition with Himself to be the best that He can be with what He has.

There is much evil in the universe, and evil is equated with ignorance and death, whereas holiness is equated with knowledge and life. Thus, if you ask why there is evil in the universe, that is merely the part of God that is not as holy as the part of God that is not so evil. But there is some imperfection within all of God’s creatures, for none of God’s creatures will ever be perfect, for perfection requires an even clearer picture with even more particles than those that exist.

Over time, God’s universe tends to improve, because, over time, God has had more time to consolidate His particles in a way that He wants to, and He has acquired more raw materials, which would make Him better able to create even more knowledgeable creatures than those which He has already created.

God is God

Those who forsake God will be forsaken. Those who cast aside God will be cast aside by God. Don’t you worry: God is watching. He watches you at all times and in all places. You have no privacy from God. You are naked before Him. And He takes account of all that you do, all that you say, and all that you think. The shortest distance between you and salvation is the Philosophy of Life. Know this.

I invite you to watch this musical video by Laibach; a remix of the song of the same name by Juno Reactor. You won’t find it on MTV:

Time for Philosophy Pt. VI

Numbers are limited, by definition. There cannot be an unlimited number, or there wouldn’t be a number. Thus, everything is finite. What we call “infinity” is actually the increase in a finite number. The number of particles in the universe happens to be infinite, and time happens to be infinite, but that is because there is a continuous increase in the number of particles in the universe, as well as the moments of time that have existed, as will be explained. For now, let us realize that an infinite number is finite at any given time, but a finite number is not necessarily infinite.

There is a finite number of cubic particles in the universe, and these cubic particles have existed for a finite amount of time. The number of particles in the universe is a certain number; and the number of times that at least one cube has moved from one slot to the next is also a limited number. Each time that a cube has moved from one slot to another is a “moment” in time.

Time began when God created it. And when time began, God created a universe comprised of a certain number of cubic particles at certain distances from each other: distances that can objectively be measured by the number of potential cubes between them. The exact number and orientation of the particles in the universe was determined by a random “roll of the dice.” In fact, particles have been continuously added to the universe in accordance with a random “roll of the dice.”

The reason for this is that God does not—and cannot—plan on what He creates, until He creates it because there is no “command center” or “mind of God” outside of the universe itself, or the “body of God.” The mind and body of God are as one. God cannot and does not imagine thing “outside” of the universe or “before” they become real, because there is nothing but the universe, for the universe is God, and God is the universe.

However, God wants there to be as many cubic particles in His universe as possible, so that He can create as precise and as clearly defined model of Himself as possible. Analogous to this is the number of pixels on a computer screen. The higher the number of pixels, the more precise the image that can be formed on the computer. Likewise, God wants his universe to have as many hypothetical pixels as possible, so God never stops creating cubic particles.

Cubic particles are constantly added to God, His universe, His body, in a totally random and unpredictable way, because God cannot control how particles are added to His universe; only that particles are added to His universe. Once cubic particles suddenly arise in His universe—i.e. the moment immediately subsequent to that phenomenon—God moves those particles in such a way that they best represent Him. Thus, motion in the universe tends to be direct and linear, because God chooses the shortest distance between two particles to finish the job as soon as possible.

Just as there is a limited number of cubes that have accumulated over time, there is a limited number of moments that have accumulated over time. The number of moments that have been added to the universe thus far is the objective and absolute age of the universe.

Space and time can be measured objectively. The distance between one cubic particle and another cubic particle is measured by the number of spaces, pockets, or slots between them. The amount of time from one moment to another moment is defined as the number of instances that either a particle has moved, or has been added to the universe.

Time for Philosophy Pt. V

What is the material universe that makes up the substance—or building blocks—that is used to construct the idea of God?

It is comprised of space-and-time-based models of God within the brain, which is the container that holds this knowledge. In short, the building blocks that are used to compose the idea of God are made of “space-time.”

How is space-time used to represent the idea of God? By way of matter and motion. What is matter and motion?

Matter is comprised of particles, which are the building blocks that are used to depict God. What are particles?

Particles are irreducible cubes. A cube is a polyhedron with six sides. All cubic particles are the same size. Why are particles cubes that are the same size?

All particles are cubes of the same size because it is in this manner that perfect stacking is possible. When, in the construction of an idea, there is a desire to put particles together to form what would appear to be a single unit, the cube is the only shape that is capable of doing this perfectly. The shape that is least conducive to stacking is the sphere, because it is impossible to stack spheres. Thus, the idea that elementary particles are ultimately comprised of spheres couldn’t be further from the truth. It comes from our observation of planetary bodies, and the assumption that the most elementary particles are similarly shaped.

Whereas the cubic particles can be thought of as “positive space,” the space between particles can be thought of as “negative space.” The reason that there is negative space is that the negative must exist in order for the positive to exist. This goes back to ontology: the rule that something must exist, because nothing cannot exist. To have a positive cubic particle, there must be a negative emptiness surrounding it. The emptiness, however, is not “nothing”; it is indeed something: it is empty space, which is the opposite of full space. Positive space is comprised of cubes, and negative space is comprised of empty pockets that can be described as “potential cubes.”

That is space-matter. But what is time-motion? Time-motion is the process whereby a cube moves from one slot to another adjacent slot. This movement is not gradual, but discrete. Otherwise, there would be no motion at all, as illustrated by Zeno’s paradoxes. The cube “jumps” from one slot to another adjacent slot, because it is only in that way that motion can take place. And it cannot “skip” a slot, because the very definition of a “slot” is where a cube would move next, if God were to move it. Furthermore, no two cubes can occupy the same slot; otherwise they wouldn’t be “two” cubes, but one cube.

Time for Philosophy Pt. IV

So far, I explained that there must be a free will in the universe that decides what exists, and that this Free Will decides that it exists. So of all possible entities, the Free Will chooses itself as the entity that exists. This Free Will is named “God.”

What else is there to say about it? In other words, now that we know that it exists, the question is how it exists. The answer is that it exists as the idea of God, as in—the idea that we human beings are capable of having of God through the Philosophy of Life. It is by way of the Philosophy of Life that God is brought to life, for it is in this manner that God exists.

How does the idea of God exist? Now we are getting more specific. The idea of God exists as a material entity. What is a material entity? A material entity is something that is comprised of a material substance—or building blocks—and that derives from the material universe.

Updated: Russian archaeologists find long-lost Jewish capital

Click here for the updated article. Click here for photos.